Has anyone on the list tried this patch? Feedback would be appreciated.

Thanks,

K

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Florent Angly <florent.an...@gmail.com>wrote:

>  Can anyone comment on my email please?
> Florent
>
>
>
> On 22/05/11 14:03, Florent Angly wrote:
>
> Let me know if you have any questions about this.
> Thanks,
> Florent
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: Request for pulling the
> updated FASTQ (de-)interlacer tool  Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:47:13 +1000  
> From:
> Florent Angly <florent.an...@gmail.com> <florent.an...@gmail.com>  To:
> galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu 
> <galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu><galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu>
>
> Dear Galaxy team,
> Please consider pulling these changes I made to the
> interlacer/de-interlacer tools into the main Galaxy 
> repository:https://bitbucket.org/fangly/galaxy-central/changeset/7f7ec8f05d36
> While the tools were handling mate pairs fine, I now added the ability
> to also keep single reads (reads that miss their mate) in a separate
> file. The functional tests were updated and pass.
> Thanks,
> Florent
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
>
>  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
>
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Reply via email to