i usually prefix the history names with an identifier so i can search for
them (e.g. "AmiMT: read QC"). but i agree, folders similar to the data
libraries would be useful, so i created a ticket.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Chaolin Zhang <zhangchao...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Is there a way to organize related histories together into a "project" or
> I realize in a lot of cases, a pipeline is designed for processing of a
> single sample, while a study typically consists of multiple samples that go
> through the same processing. They are then put together for more downstream
> analysis. It seems to me that it would be logical to put the processing of
> each individual file into a history, and the combined analysis into another,
> which would be bundled together. I, and other users here have a growing
> list of histories, and it is becoming more and more difficult to organize
> them ...
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: