Hello all,

Further to recent discussions about dealing with large
FASTQ files, and the short term advantages of gzipped
FASTQ as a filetype in Galaxy (or gzipped files in general,
https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/issue/666/ ), we
also discussed the merits of unaligned BAM files.

It occurred to me this could be defined in Galaxy as
subclass of the existing BAM definition, with a simple
sniffer based on running "samtools idxstats" to find out
if there are any mapped reads or not.

This would then make it easy for tools capable of
aligning SAM/BAM to list unaligned-bam as a Galaxy
input format (avoiding complications of realigning
previously aligned reads).

You could also have a matching aligned BAM
subclass, then tools like SNP detectors should
insist on an aligned BAM file for input.

Does this sound reasonable?

Peter
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Reply via email to