On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Greg Von Kuster <g...@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
> I'm fairly far down the implementation path for supporting inclusion of
> new data types in tool shed repositories.  Unless I get steered into
> another direction, I should have this documented in early January.

Right, and great for niche formats, but I thought we'd agreed that
"common" datatypes should go into the core to avoid multiple
conflicting/independent definitions?


Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:


Reply via email to