On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:03 AM, Cittaro Davide wrote:
> Hi Nate,
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Nate Coraor wrote:
>> That said, if you have a lot interim steps that produce large data that then
>> get merged via some process back to final outputs, it absolutely makes sense
>> to use local disk for those steps (assuming local disk is large enough -
>> another problem that we sometimes encounter).
> Wouldn't mean that most of the workflows dealing with NGS data should run on
> local disks?
It depends on the location and ordering of the steps - If you're parallelizing
single steps across multiple nodes, it wouldn't make sense. If you run
multiple steps serially on a single node, then you could work locally between
> Davide Cittaro, PhD
> Head of Bioinformatics Core
> Center for Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics
> San Raffaele Scientific Institute
> Via Olgettina 58
> 20132 Milano
> Office: +39 02 26439140
> Mail: cittaro.dav...@hsr.it
> Skype: daweonline
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: