On Jan 23, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Hans-Rudolf Hotz wrote:

> Hi Nate
> 
> Yes, upgrading one of our old servers with "hg pull -u -r 63bc46cc73b7" and 
> downloading a new clone with "hg clone http://www.bx.psu.edu/hg/galaxy 
> galaxy-dist", does not result in the same changeset number (ie '6528')
> 
> Thank you very much
> Hans

Hi Hans,

So with the latest dist version where the changeset number is still off, is it 
still showing 2 heads?  Is the older head still 70b8039a2eef?  What version of 
Mercurial is this?

How about the output of 'hg branches', 'hg branches -a', and 'hg branches -c'?

Thanks,
--nate

> 
> 
> 
> On 01/20/2012 09:04 AM, Hans-Rudolf Hotz wrote:
>> Hi Nate
>> 
>> Thank you very much for your e-mail
>> 
>> I am still testing and working on the last distribution, hopefully going
>> live this Sunday. But I will look into downloading and upgrading (one of
>> our dev servers) to the new distribution next week.
>> 
>> Regards, Hans
>> 
>> On 01/19/2012 07:39 PM, Nate Coraor wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>> 
>>> We're releasing a distribution today. If this is still the case with
>>> that distribution, let me know. There were branches that weren't
>>> showing up under newer versions of Mercurial. Hopefully this is all
>>> resolved in the latest.
>>> 
>>> --nate
>>> 
>>> On Jan 17, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Hans-Rudolf Hotz wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> I am in the process of upgrading all our Galaxy servers to the
>>>> current changeset ("b258de1e6cea", Nov. 18) and I have noticed an
>>>> inconsistency:
>>>> 
>>>> If I upgrade one of our old servers (which was on "720455407d1c",
>>>> June 23) with 'hg pull -u -r b258de1e6cea' I get the following:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> haruhotz@silicon: hg heads
>>>> changeset: 6297:b258de1e6cea
>>>> tag: tip
>>>> user: jeremy goecks<jeremy.goe...@emory.edu>
>>>> date: Thu Nov 17 15:08:49 2011 -0500
>>>> summary: Pack js scripts.
>>>> 
>>>> haruhotz@silicon:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If I create a new installation with
>>>> 'hg clone http://www.bx.psu.edu/hg/galaxy galaxy-dist' I get the
>>>> following:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> haruhotz@silicon: hg heads
>>>> changeset: 6298:b258de1e6cea
>>>> tag: tip
>>>> user: jeremy goecks<jeremy.goe...@emory.edu>
>>>> date: Thu Nov 17 15:08:49 2011 -0500
>>>> summary: Pack js scripts.
>>>> 
>>>> changeset: 5832:70b8039a2eef
>>>> branch: feature/ws
>>>> parent: 5826:6206a27bd2ae
>>>> user: Nate Coraor<n...@bx.psu.edu>
>>>> date: Wed Jul 27 10:48:03 2011 -0400
>>>> summary: Closed the feature/ws branch, changes from this branch were
>>>> merged in 5827:f3a1086fac91.
>>>> 
>>>> haruhotz@silicon:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I am not worry about the merged branched, I am just a little bit
>>>> surprised about the differences:
>>>> 
>>>> "6298:b258de1e6cea" versus "6297:b258de1e6cea"
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Can anybody with more mercurial experience enlighten me what went
>>>> wrong? and even better tell me that there is nothing to worry about...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards, Hans
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ___________________________________________________________
>>>> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
>>>> in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
>>>> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
>>>> 
>>>> http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
>>> 


___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Reply via email to