We are also "feeling the hurt" of not being able to carry the input
dataset names through a complex workflow. We are also very interested
in a solution similar to what Dave Walton has proposed,. Dave, would it
be possible to receive a copy of your modified code? Does it work when
there are multiple inputs? Ideally we would keep the names of datasets
that are run through complex workflows the same as the workflow
progresses. Sample mix-ups are a common scare, and with the current
default naming it is not far fetched to see someone accidentally
associating the end result with a different sample number.
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: