On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Dannon Baker <dannonba...@me.com> wrote:
> I'm still working on figuring out who created the AMI you're running
> across (it isn't under the main Galaxy cloud account, see the
> '072133624695' in the name string), but for future reference we'll always
> keep the recommended AMI to use listed on usegalaxy.org/cloud. At this
> point, it's still ami-da58aab3 (861460482541/galaxy-cloudman-2011-03-22).
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:47 PM, John Major wrote:
> > Hello GalFolks-
> > I saw a new galaxy-cloudman AMI appear
> > ( 072133624695/galaxy-cloudman-2012-02-26 ) and was interested in giving
> it a whirl.
> > But when I tried to launch it got the following error:
> > """
> > The requested instance type's architecture (x86_64) does not match the
> architecture in the manifest for aki-407d9529 (i386)
> > """
> > Is this a dev-AMI? Or should I be expecting this to run?
> > Thanks-
> > John
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> > in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
> > and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
> > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: