Awesome!  Thanks

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Dannon Baker <dannonba...@me.com> wrote:

> John,
>
> I'm still working on figuring out who created the AMI you're running
> across (it isn't under the main Galaxy cloud account, see the
> '072133624695' in the name string), but for future reference we'll always
> keep the recommended AMI to use listed on usegalaxy.org/cloud.  At this
> point, it's still ami-da58aab3 (861460482541/galaxy-cloudman-2011-03-22).
>
> -Dannon
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:47 PM, John Major wrote:
>
> > Hello GalFolks-
> >
> > I saw a new galaxy-cloudman AMI appear
> > ( 072133624695/galaxy-cloudman-2012-02-26 ) and was interested in giving
> it a whirl.
> > But when I tried to launch it got the following error:
> >
> > """
> > The requested instance type's architecture (x86_64) does not match the
> architecture in the manifest for aki-407d9529 (i386)
> > """
> >
> > Is this a dev-AMI?  Or should I be expecting this to run?
> >
> > Thanks-
> > John
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> > in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
> > and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
> >
> >  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
>
>
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Reply via email to