sounds great, thanks peter.  i granted you access to my toolshed repo, but
perhaps we want only one tool in the toolshed when all done.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Edward,
> >
> > We're now running BLAST+ searches on our local Galaxy via our cluster,
> > and some of the cluster nodes have relatively small amounts of RAM.
> > This means I've become more aware of limitations in the NCBI BLAST+
> > tools' support for using a subject FASTA file (instead of making a local
> > BLAST database), which turns out to be surprisingly RAM hungry.
> >
> > The logical step is to allow users to build a BLAST database as a new
> > datatype in Galaxy - which is what you (Edward) did some time ago as
> > a fork, later posted to the Galaxy Tool Shed.
> >
> > Edward - are you happy for me to merge your work into the main
> > wrappers? I mentioned idea this a couple of months ago:
> > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/pipermail/galaxy-dev/2012-February/008544.html
>
> Note this will take some extra work - we need to support protein
> BLAST databases as well, not just nucleotide database.
>
> Peter
>
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Reply via email to