your suggestion for blastdbn and blastdbp sounds fine.
it's okay if a few of our users need to edit the metadata of the dbs in
their history.
thanks for asking and doing this.

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Peter Cock <>wrote:

> Hi Edward,
> I've started work on this in earnest now. I see you only defined one
> new datatype, blastdb, which worked for nucleotide databases.
> I want to handle protein databases too, so I think two datatypes
> makes sense - which I am currently calling blastdbn and blastdbp.
> That won't be compatible with your existing tools & history, but
> other than that seems sensible to me. I suppose we could use
> blastdb and blastdb_p which would match the *.loc files?
> What do you think?
> Peter
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

Reply via email to