Looks great, committed in -central changeset 02fe49c3d251
On Oct 6, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Björn Grüning wrote:
> Hi all,
> if we try to wrap a single script-tool, for example bismark , it has
> its own version number and should be included in <version_command>.
> I would like to ship bismark with the wrapper. That means that bismark
> is not included in PATH, but exists next to the bismark_wrapper.xml
> file. That isn't a problem for the <command> tag, but for the
> <version_command> tag, because it assumes the executed tool in PATH.
> Attached is a patch that adds the same <command> logic to
> <version_command> if a interpreter is specified.
>  http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/bismark/
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: