The paper is good , i was looking something like it.
Ok, I will use CBL , just a small query :
we use CBL for cloud man purpose, i think yes . Should we use the same Image
for workers and enable cloudman script to use that one for launching nodes ?
On W7-Feb 11, 2013, at 9:27 PM, Enis Afgan wrote:
> Here's a link to the architecture paper:
> Building CloudMan image from the repo you mention will not work - that repo
> is for cloudman itself while you need an image capable of running cloudman.
> For that, you should use CBL.
> Also, here are some instructions about setting up cloudman and galaxy on
> OpenNebula cloud:
> https://www.cloud.sara.nl/projects/mattiasdehollander-project/wiki (note that
> this mentions use of mi-deployment set of scripts; since that, mi-deployment
> has been merged into CBL).
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Zeeshan Ali Shah <zas...@pdc.kth.se> wrote:
> Thanks for answers ,
> Actually i tried to understand cloudman role in galaxy , do you have an
> architecture paper which i should read ? for e.g. what i unserstood si that
> cloud man runs a python server and manage SGE through it via some python
> script . (may be i am wrong)
> Our proposed installation is like this: Users launch cloud man from Open
> nebula cloud, when cloudman is running they can add more nodes which are
> endup in same private cloud. As you suggested in this particular case I
> should have same images both for (master cloudman) and workers , am i right ?
> actually i built one image via https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/cloudman . DO you
> suggest that I should built image from CBL tree you mentioned below ? which
> wd have both cloudman and galaxy together.
> On W6-Feb 8, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Enis Afgan wrote:
>> As far as actually building the image, the recommended method is to use
>> CloudBioLinux build scripts: https://github.com/chapmanb/cloudbiolinux
>> There is a CloudMan flavor of CBL that allows you to build only CloudMan-
>> and Galaxy-required parts:
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Dannon Baker <dannonba...@me.com> wrote:
>> The workers don't need their own copy of galaxy installed, but a shared
>> filesystem is a requirement for galaxy (in any cluster environment -- see
>> the galaxy wiki for more
>> http://wiki.galaxyproject.org/Admin/Config/Performance/Cluster). Cloudman
>> handles managing NFS for you and sharing the galaxy/tools/index/data
>> volumes. In order for workers to communicate with the master instance,
>> they'll need the cloudman installation as well, so you should use the same
>> Now that I've answered that, I'm not sure I totally understand your proposed
>> installation yet, but if you're suggesting bypassing cloudman for
>> installation on a private cloud it should be possible. You'd want the
>> master instance up full time running as the galaxy front end, dispatching
>> jobs to a separate cluster managed by SGE/PBS/whatever. Basically the
>> standard cluster configuration outlined in the wiki above, but you'd want
>> your worker nodes automatically configured to mount the shared directories
>> and join the PBS/SGE queue so they could handle jobs.
>> Depending on what type of private cloud you're working with, it might be
>> easier to just see if you can get cloudman to work :)
>> Lastly, I swapped this message to galaxy-dev since it's about installation
>> nuts and bolts.
>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Zeeshan Ali Shah <zas...@pdc.kth.se> wrote:
>> > Dear Enis, thanks for reply and being you as cloudman developer it is good
>> > to see you in the list .
>> > Q2: On Workers node we need galaxy installed with its shared directories ?
>> > like galaxyindices , galaxydata
>> > Q3: For a private cloud setup do you prefare to have a master image with
>> > cloudman and galaxy and use the same image for workers as well ? or worker
>> > images can be vanilla OS ?
>> > BR
>> > Zeeshan
>> > On W6-Feb 7, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Enis Afgan wrote:
>> >> Hi Zeeshan,
>> >> In order to gain from the scalability of the cloud, SGE does need to run.
>> >> However, CloudMan sets all that up and manages it going forward.
>> >> Enis
>> >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Zeeshan Ali Shah <zas...@pdc.kth.se>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> It seems that cloud man need SGE for scaling . Does SGE need also when
>> >> run cloud on private cloud ?
>> >> Zeeshan
>> >> ___________________________________________________________
>> >> The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
>> >> Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
>> >> at usegalaxy.org. Please keep all replies on the list by
>> >> using "reply all" in your mail client. For discussion of
>> >> local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
>> >> use the Galaxy Development list:
>> >> http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev
>> >> To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
>> >> please use the interface at:
>> >> http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
>> > ___________________________________________________________
>> > The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
>> > Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
>> > at usegalaxy.org. Please keep all replies on the list by
>> > using "reply all" in your mail client. For discussion of
>> > local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
>> > use the Galaxy Development list:
>> > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev
>> > To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
>> > please use the interface at:
>> > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: