Hi Peter,

This change would be simple to make, but it would result in the inclusion of 
all repositories with missing test components to be included in the list of 
failing tests.  There are currently 2 filters that provide the information to 
categorize these repositories: missing test components ( True / False ) and 
tools functionally correct ( True / False ).  I'm not sure it makes sense to 
add a 3rd filter, but if we can come up with a sensible one, I would be happy 
to add it.  If not, do you want the list of failing tool tests to include 
repositories that are missing test components?

Thanks!

Greg

On May 7, 2013, at 4:50 AM, Peter Cock wrote:

> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Dave Bouvier <d...@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
>> Peter,
>> 
>> Yes, there are a few issues that are causing some repositories not to be
>> tested correctly. I've discovered the problem, but the solution will require
>> a bit of work. My goal is to have this resolved as soon as possible.
>> 
>>  --Dave B.
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Things are looking sensible again on the Test Tool Shed - thanks :)
> 
> I have a query which might deserve discussion: Currently my
> some of my BLAST+ tools have missing tests and some are
> failing (due in part to limitations of the test framework) yet
> the repository is only listed under missing tool tests:
> 
> Latest revision: missing tool tests - includes ncbi_blast_plus
> Latest revision: failing tool tests - omits ncbi_blast_plus
> http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus
> 
> As the yellow description makes clear, this is deliberate,
> but I would prefer to have ncbi_blast_plus listed in both
> places. In this case I know there are missing tests, but
> would hope there are no failing tests - yet the Tool Shed
> interface is effectively 'hiding' these failures from the
> prominent listing.
> 
> (Right now the failures are unexpected, it seems my
> changes to the automated installation were not successful
> - but that's why I'm testing them here to check this)
> 
> What does everyone else think?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Peter
> ___________________________________________________________
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
> http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
> 
> To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
> http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/


___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/

Reply via email to