Hello Peter,

On May 23, 2013, at 4:49 AM, Peter Cock wrote:

> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Greg Von Kuster <g...@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
>> I cannot guarantee it, but this may be related to a fix I just committed
>> that populates the <repository> tag in the dependency definitions with a
>> toolshed attribute if it is missing (it looks like it is in your case).  I
>> used to not populate the tag, but simply stored the tool shed in the
>> repository metadata.  Bjorn discovered, however, that certain repository
>> installations would not succeed if the toolshed attribute was missing.  WHen
>> I investigated this, I discovered  that some downstream stuff could not
>> locate the appropriate tool shed if the attribute was missing from the tag.
>> I fixed this in 9836:252027d00b44 by populating this tag attribute if it
>> was missing.  Unfortunately, a new dependency definition has to be uploaded
>> to those repositories that have definitions where it is not set in order to
>> get this fix.
>> I don't know if updating your dependency file in this repository will fix
>> this issue, but just wanted to alert you to this.
>> Very sorry for any inconvenience!
>> Greg Von Kuster
> Finger's crossed - I've changed repository_dependencies.xml by
> updating the comment in it,
> http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus/bb81d3afa28d
> http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go/f3a61c2cf309
> http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr/482b7f4d3587
> As an aside, the XML comment line seems not to show up properly
> in the HTML diff view on the toolshed for this change. For example:

Yes, comments were stripped out and not saved.  However, I've committed a fix 
for this issue in 9844:0acfbcd4235b, so all future comments should be saved.  
Sorry for the inconvenience of losing any comments you had previously.

> Commit message:
> Uploaded v0.0.20 preview 8, update comment in dependencies XML
> modified:
> tools/ncbi_blast_plus/repository_dependencies.xml
> tools/ncbi_blast_plus/repository_dependencies.xml
> --- a/tools/ncbi_blast_plus/repository_dependencies.xmlMon May 20
> 10:04:51 2013 -0400
> +++ b/tools/ncbi_blast_plus/repository_dependencies.xmlThu May 23
> 04:47:28 2013 -0400
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <repositories description="This requires the BLAST datatype
> definitions (e.g. the BLAST XML format).">
> -<!-- Revision 4:f9a7783ed7b6 on the main tool shed is v0.0.14 which
> added BLAST databases -->
> -<repository name="blast_datatypes" owner="devteam"
> changeset_revision="f9a7783ed7b6" />
> -</repositories>
> +
> +<repository changeset_revision="f9a7783ed7b6" name="blast_datatypes"
> owner="devteam" toolshed="http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu"; />
> +</repositories>
> \ No newline at end of file
> That first "plus" line should give the new comment, i.e.
> <!-- Revision 4:f9a7783ed7b6 on the main (and test) tool shed is
> v0.0.14 which added BLAST databases -->
> Regards,
> Peter

Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:

Reply via email to