This is not an objection, but do we need bash? Can we live with posix sh? We should ask this question about every requirement we introduce.
(bash is not part of the default installation of FreeBSD or OpenBSD for example. bash is unfortunately licensed under GPLV3, so if you are trying to create an OS not polluted by viral licensing you don't get bash). On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:36 AM, John Chilton <chil...@msi.umn.edu> wrote: > My own preference is that we specify at least /bin/sh and /bin/bash > are available before utilizing the tool shed. Is there an objection to > this from any corner? Is there realistically a system that Galaxy > should support that will not have /bin/bash available? -- James Taylor, Associate Professor, Biology/CS, Emory University ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/