On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Good news, the BLAST+ tests appear to have all passed on the Test Tool Shed,
> http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus/f2478dc77ccb
>
> ...
>
> Over on the main Tool Shed, the binary installation seems to be failing
> (still using the bash script magic - is the test system still missing bash,
> or is there a different problem here?). Here too, there doesn't seem to
> be any mention of the tools missing tests.
>
> At this point (given it is working on the Test Tool Shed), I think it should
> be safe to update the BLAST+ packages to use the new architecture/os
> specific <action> tags (a recent feature which is now supported in the
> stable Galaxy releases):
>
> http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_26
> http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_27
> http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_28

I've just done that on the main Tool Shed, fingers crossed that will
give a green light on the overnight test results for the BLAST+
wrappers.

Peter
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/

Reply via email to