On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Good news, the BLAST+ tests appear to have all passed on the Test Tool Shed,
> http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus/f2478dc77ccb
> ...
> Over on the main Tool Shed, the binary installation seems to be failing
> (still using the bash script magic - is the test system still missing bash,
> or is there a different problem here?). Here too, there doesn't seem to
> be any mention of the tools missing tests.
> At this point (given it is working on the Test Tool Shed), I think it should
> be safe to update the BLAST+ packages to use the new architecture/os
> specific <action> tags (a recent feature which is now supported in the
> stable Galaxy releases):
> http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_26
> http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_27
> http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_28

I've just done that on the main Tool Shed, fingers crossed that will
give a green light on the overnight test results for the BLAST+

Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:

Reply via email to