On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Nov 18, 2014 7:26 AM, "John Chilton" <jmchil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I will admit to not actually understanding Galaxy's dependency management >> but I think virtualenv is exactly the advice people who do understand it >> give >> http://dev.list.galaxyproject.org/Local-installation-problem-td4662627.html. >> It is a widely used tool precisely designed to solve such problems - I think >> it is the best way to go. I don't know why it would not be appropriate for >> existing installations - I think it is in fact somethimg of a "best >> practice" for existing installations. > > Our existing installation is not using a virtual env, and I fear switching to > that could be disruptive.
Getting back to TravisCI, using a virtual env wasn't too painful: https://github.com/peterjc/pico_galaxy/commit/26489a65a9cd60f9d055488d003346eab87941b0 I can now get back to tweaking the tests I was working on :) Thanks, Peter ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/