Ok, I'll figure out what I can take on here in terms of being more systematic
about determining the various error cases/fixes visa vis the master_api_key and
the API, and will get back to you. Having the master key work without a user
object does sound like the pure way to go.
From: John Chilton [jmchil...@gmail.com] ...
Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] master_api_key currently doesn't benefit from a real
Thanks for the detailed description - this gives me a better
understanding of what is going on. Okay - I think the right way to
handle this is probably to make the master api key work everywhere
where the user API key is insufficient.
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: