Yay! Happy New Year for the Galaxy Tool community :)

Thank you,

Peter

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Dave Bouvier <d...@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> After fixing a number of issues, it appears that the tests are now running
> as they should. I'll keep an eye on the test framework in case any new
> errors crop up.
>
>    --Dave B.
>
>
> On 12/10/2014 09:19 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:03 PM, John Chilton <jmchil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> The good news is my list of failing tools has shrunk to the following,
>>>> none of which seem to have been tested yet in December, stuck
>>>> with "Exception: Job in error state.":
>>>>
>>>> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go
>>>> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr
>>>> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod
>>>> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/mira_assembler
>>>> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/nlstradamus
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, on the main tool,  "Exception: Job in error state."
>>>> and not yet tested in December:
>>>>
>>>> https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice to have a more informative error here...
>>>
>>>
>>> Ugh - yes it clearly would - very sorry about that.
>>>
>>> https://trello.com/c/BZUaMnJB
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have these tools been automatically earmarked not to be retested?
>>>> Note that some tools have been tested earlier this month:
>>>>
>>>> I also have a legitimate failure for missing tests, run 2014-12-09,
>>>> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus
>>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting... some tests did run though? Does the framework not
>>> report passing tests - seems like it would be hard to know if it
>>> working in that case.
>>
>>
>> The "Latest revision: all tool tests pass" search returns lots of
>> repositories, but I must examine each one-by-one to see when
>> the tests were last run. The sample I just checked on the main
>> Tool Shed were all lasted tested 2014-11-23,
>>
>> https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/align_back_trans
>> https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast_rbh
>> https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr
>> https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod
>> https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_select_by_id
>>
>> However at least some tests have been run in December, e.g.
>> https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/devteam/ncbi_blast_plus
>>
>> Things seem similar on the Test Tool Shed. Presumably you
>> can sort the test results over the entire Tool Shed via a
>> database search? That might help explain any pattern here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/

Reply via email to