On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Now that you've fixed some of the test back log, the bad
> news is this issue I reported last week appears to be a major
> regression affecting multiple tools on the Test Tool Shed:
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/align_back_trans
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod
> ...
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/nlstradamus
> ...
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/sample_seqs
> ...
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_select_by_id
> These are all recent test runs from 2015-03-18. Note that
> some tool tests from the same date are passing, e.g.
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast_rbh
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_composition
> https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/mummer

Hi Dave,

These tools do not seem to have been tested on the TestToolShed
since 2015-03-18. Does something need resetting/unblocking again?


Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:

Reply via email to