Hello Nicola

Thanks for pointing this out, much appreciated.

I've tried a naive patch of our 17.09 release (i.e. just putting the edits from 
the PR into the code base) but it didn't seem to make any difference for the 
specific case of the 'interval' file. I don't know if some other change is 
required from elsewhere or if I messed up somehow.

Anyway: I think we'll wait for 18.01 to fix it. In the meantime thanks again 
for your help!

Best wishes

Peter

--
Peter Briggs [email protected]
Bioinformatics Core Facility University of Manchester
B.1083 Michael Smith Bldg Tel: (0161) 2751482

________________________________
From: Nicola Soranzo [[email protected]] on behalf of 
[email protected] [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 9:58 PM
To: Peter Briggs; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] "Edit attributes" for interval dataset not consistent 
with documentation

Dear Peter,
this bug has been recently reported in 
https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/issues/4966 and fixed in 
https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/pull/5027 for the upcoming 18.01 Galaxy 
release.
Not sure if this is worth a backport, but if you need it for 17.09 and want to 
try, it should be feasible.

Cheers,
Nicola

------ Messaggio originale------
Da: Peter Briggs
Data: gio 18 gen 2018 12:11
A: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
CC:
Oggetto:[galaxy-dev] "Edit attributes" for interval dataset not consistent with 
documentation


Dear Devs

One of my local users has noticed that the "edit attributes" function for 
"interval"-type datasets is not consistent with the documentation at:

https://galaxyproject.org/learn/datatypes/#interval

This states that only CHROM, START, and END are required, with the implication 
that other fields are optional.

However when editing the attributes for a dataset, if either of "Strand" or 
"Name" are not set to an explicit column number then "Save attributes" fails 
with the message: "Error occurred while saving. Please fill all the required 
fields and try again."

This is true on both our local Galaxy running release_17.09 and also on Galaxy 
main.

Is this a bug in the documentation, or the implementation?

Thanks,

Peter

--
Peter Briggs 
[email protected]<mailto:%[email protected]>
Bioinformatics Core Facility University of Manchester
B.1083 Michael Smith Bldg Tel: (0161) 2751482<tel:(0161)%202751482>

___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/

Reply via email to