Hi Jeremy,

Thank you very much for your reply.

I have one more question about the "Anchor length". For a RNA-seq read mapped 
on the splicing junction under the 0 mismatch condition, if 5 nucleotides of 
one end map on one exon, does it mean the rest part of the read must map on the 
adjacent exon? What I want to understand is that, although reducing "Anchor 
length" may reduce the reliability of mapping on one end/exon, but the 
increased number of mapped nucleotides on the adjacent exon may increase the 
reliability of mapping. Does it mean overall the reliability of mapping is not 



From: Jeremy Goecks [jeremy.goe...@emory.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:16 PM
To: Du, Jianguang
Cc: galaxy-user@lists.bx.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [galaxy-user] Are reads of 36nt in length long enough to accutatly 
map on splicing junctions?

1) My reads are 36nt long. How much should I set for "the Minimum length of 
reads segments" to get the most reliable output with the highest mapping of 
splicing junctions?. In my previous run of TopHat, I set it as 18. Can I reduce 
it more to get better mapping on splicing junctions?

You'll need to define for yourself what you mean by "better/best mapping" and 
experiment to find the parameters that give you the best results.

2) I do not understand exactly how TopHat works as for the "Anchor length" 
although I have read the manual for TopHat.
Suppose I set the "Anchor length as 8 and the "Maximum number of mismatch that 
can appear in the anchor region of spliced alignment" as 0 when I run Tophat. 
Does it mean, for a read maps on two adjacent exons, TopHat will report this 
alignment to the outputs ".accepted hits" and ".splicing junctions" if either 
end of the read has 8 or more nucleotides mapping on one exon?

I think that's correct.

3) Is there disadvantage/negative effect if I choose to set the "Anchor length" 
at the lowest, for example 3? My understanding is that, under the 0 mismatch 
condition, if 3 nuceoides of one end of a read mapped on one exon, the other 
part of the read will map on the adjacent exon (in my case, the other part 
would be 33 nucleotides). So my understanding is that setting the "Anchor 
length" at 3 does not increase the inaccuracy of the alignment. Am I correct?

Setting the anchor length especially small reduces the constraints on mapping, 
so more reads will map but there are likely to be more false positives as well.

Good luck,
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using "reply all" in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:


To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:


To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:


Reply via email to