On Monday 20 April 2009, Stephen Bungay wrote: > It is the nature of radio buttons to allow only one in a set to be > toggled on, If you really want to go that route then I would suggest > that you use checkboxes instead of radio buttons, A better way (IMHO) is > to place a third button on the form labelled as "Unknown" and set that > one when the gender is a null. >
IMHO indeed the right solution. But when the person is a shemale/transgender ??? :) The checkboxes fits well in that case. Still the radios are better (IMHO) and a 4'th should be add too? 'Unknown', 'Male', 'Female', 'Cross' Just the modern times are comming :) Best regards, Ron_1st -- PS. Forgotten, the people that are just an animal. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
