I apologize if I gave you the wrong impression. I didn't intend for you to change anything. I was just wondering if it could already be done and I was missing it.
I really like Gambas and have been enjoying the learning experience. Thanks for creating it. Benoît Minisini wrote: > You get a point there: optional arguments cannot really be used in > constructors, unless you do not use inheritance. Because the rule is that if > an argument is optional, all following arguments are. Which is a > contradiction > with the way arguments are used. > > Maybe I should change the way arguments are consumed by inherited > constructors. I mean not inverting them, i.e. inverting them on the stack, so > that you write New MyControl(FMain, lVal1, lVal2...). But this will uses some > CPU. > > I must think about that... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
