On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 23:03 -0400, Kevin Fishburne wrote: > That will probably work, but there should be a mathematical way to > compensate for not cropping the image twice, or even once. As long as > the entire image is preserved by the rotation function (it is) and it > behaves in a predictable manner (it does), the camera's coordinates > should be able to be translated and rotated so that they are in the same > position in the rotated image as they were in the non-rotated image. For > the sake of efficiency that is what I'm trying to accomplish. > This thread might help. (or not)
http://forums.libsdl.org/viewtopic.php?t=2983&sid=1d2c6a94470c0fd56f3f542cd702ec37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
