Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Version Type-Bug Priority-Medium OpSys-Any Dist-Any Arch-Any Desktop-Any GUI-Any
New issue 140 by emil.len...@gmail.com: Optional argument parser not good enough. http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=140 1) Describe the problem. The parser that parses optional arguments in function declarations is a bit strange. This is OK: Public arr As New Integer[2] Public Sub Func(Optional i As Integer = arr[0]) End But this is a syntax error according to the parser: Public arr As New Integer[2, 2] Public Sub Func(Optional i As Integer = arr[0, 0]) End This is not ok either: Public Sub Func(Optional i As Integer = getSomeValue()) End However, the interpreter seems to be ready to handle that kind of code, so it is strange that the parser fails. (And if it is meant that it should only be possible to pass "simple" values, this has already failed because the first valid array syntax can be used on any class that has the _get method which also can have side effects.) 2) GIVE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATIONS (if they are appropriate): Version: TRUNK Revision: r4236 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
