Le 09/03/2016 14:21, Stephen a écrit : > Different is not the problem, going backwards by implementing a bad > design is the problem. Easier to use, faster in use, and more intuitive > to use, all of those are good; sadly a scrollable single line command > entry area with a kludge to echo the commands to the output area, is > none of those things. When compared to using print statements in the > code it is a (marginal) improvement... an evolutionary step, the next of > which would be to become what it replaced. > > Anyway, my moaning about it isn't getting the code debugged, which was > that caused a "WTF" moment and these messages, nor is it making life > better by replacing what we lost. Is it (the console) written entirely > in GAMBAS? If I can get some time I might do something about it. >
The problem was that before, some users thought that the IDE console was a true terminal, whereas it was just a read-only text-editor with tweaks. Which lead to confusion. I agree that the new interface is not very nice, but there is no confusion anymore that way. Moreover, it has a command history, which was impossible with the previous interface. And as said Fabien, as soon as he will be able to produce a true terminal emulator, we will be able to go back to a terminal-like interface. Regards, -- Benoît Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
