as i can see names for gambas software are too deorganized and without convention, inclusivelly in software farm
i recently packaged and build gogs for debian and noted the go languaje organization: 1. any older or newer version of linux can build and setup go languaje, event my lenny 2. all the software in go packaged or not, have a tree hierarchy and organization well defined The name of a package in og keep package names short and meaningful.¿, but inside that name are the path and meaning of.. as example io/ioutil but not io/util for paths and also for the name itselft suffixarray not suffix_array i think that the woftware farm must have a better rules to organizae all of them, so as go languaje does, packages and programs in farm can be reuse! Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
