The answer to your question is in the terms of the license agreement. If
as you say this mud is based on someone elses work then the original
author of said mud code has the legal say so regarding that mud and its
For example, let us say I create a mud and state in the license
agreement that the code is to be open source, and that any derivatives
must remain open source. If some hot shot comes along, takes my source,
and changes the terms of the license agreement he is in violation of the
original license. However, in order to uphold my license agreement i
have to be sure he actually used my source and not created a clone. Does
that make sense?
So in your case you believe this mud is a derivative of another mud. If
that is indeed the case the original license agreement has legal
presidents over what ever the developer of the derivative work says.
However, if this new mud is a clone, not based on the actual original
mud, then he is well with in his rights to set the terms of the license
agreement. So you have to be absolutely certain this work is a
derivative work and not a clone.
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.