On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:15:20PM -0400, John McCutchan wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 15:09 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 02:21:42PM -0400, John McCutchan wrote: > > > Yo, > > > > > > I've just committed per connection flow control. Currently only when > > > inotify is actually being used will the event queue be used. So, now for > > > some details. Each connection now has an event queue that is flushed > > > every 500 ms. When an event is to be sent to a connection, the code now > > > > hum, this is more than the human perception delay... > > > > What kind of delay would you like to see? 500 was arbitrary. What about > 100? It's just that the longer we delay, the more duplicate events we > can possibly throw away.
I'm not the right person to give an answer. sounds like another tunable parameter. I could see people not happy if users notice a delay for the file icon appearing on the desktop or this kind of things. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ Gamin-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gamin-list
