On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 11:32 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:04:42AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > Yes, if we decide to support a busy poll fallback when using inotify, it > > > would be MUCH cheaper than the dnotify was. But I'm still not convinced > > > that it is needed. > > > > I gave rationale for it, point is that if it isn't needed it won't > > be used, but implementation is ultra cheap especially on inotify. The > > problem > > is that within 3 months you won't get any feedback about those use cases. > > That said that should not block us from pushing a release to get feedback. > The main problem anyway will be to have an inotify recent kernel. Fedora > doesn't, Mandrake still use the old kernel API, so this will have limited > scope. We can still discuss the poll/no poll added support and mechanisms > independantly. > I will try to make a release over the week-end
Thanks, Excellent. -- John McCutchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Gamin-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gamin-list
