On 1/10/06, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:27:15AM -0500, William Lachance wrote: > > On 1/10/06, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean the inotify back-end broke the tests and this was never fixed > then yes. Grab a dnotify based kernel they pass. There was a discussion about > this with John back at the end of last summer about this. Ok, this makes a great deal more sense now. I agree that it's probably better to get the unit tests passing 100% before potentially destabilizing things further. -- William Lachance [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gamin-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gamin-list
