On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Michael Hanselmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, yes, I can read that, but why? Your comment is almost equivalent > to commenting “setting A to 123” for “a = 123”. Yes, that's why your question looked strange to me :) > I don't understand why > you're setting the errno type, which seems totally unrelated to > mlockall(). What about "preparing errno location so we can check it if mlockall() fails" ? Thank you, Luca
