On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:58:48AM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:41:04AM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > So it's twice as slow. That's fine for now. I'd expect this to be pure > >> > userspace load, in simplejson, and I/O waits. > >> > > >> > >> Yes, but done while holding the global lock, so other threads cannot > >> proceed with the same. > > > > Mmmm… we should be able to work around the job lock here somehow :) > > > > Ah, we totally will. :) Per-the-design-doc, we shouldn't need the > global lock, on per-job changes.
Oh right, I forgot that. I was thinking of doing the serialization outside the lock, somehow :), but it's not needed with the per-job locks. iustin
