On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:32, Iustin Pop <ius...@google.com> wrote: > OK, since I haven't heard any significant concerns (except for jokes > about impending doom :), here is the actual plan:
+1 for doing the integration. > - instead, add for each htools original vx.y.z tag, a 'htools-vx.y.z' > tag; is this naming fine? it will ruin completion, so maybe > vx.y.z-htools? (i think i like this better) Hurm. So, there will be no more new tags for htools, is that right? vx.y.z-htools tags are just for historical purposes? > - add ./configure support for detecting ghc/enabling htools (./configure > --enable-htools [default=auto]) and needed Haskell modules Win. > - integrate htools/Makefile into Makefile (rather than call it > recursively) Is this being done by an include, or actual merging? Steve
