On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:08:29AM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> I'm undecided about this patch series ☹ - feedback needed.
> 
> It's goal is to take advantage of the fact that htools can use “offline”
> data files and thus doesn't need access to a live cluster. That it does
> well.
> 
> The downside is that, not having a nice shell-level testing framework,
> this is all done in a hackish way, and if the tests fail you can't do
> anything except use "bash -x" and hope for the best.

Forgot to say: this should be considered in the light of my other email
about shell test frameworks…

iustin

Reply via email to