On 17 April 2013 09:54, Guido Trotter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Why not noded/block/drbd, then? >> >> Why not physical/block/drbd ? Who knows how we might restucture the >> daemons in the future... >> >> (Instead of "physical" we could also take something like "hardware", >> "devices", whatever; the point is, it would structure according to what >> it is, instead of a ganeti specific daemon structure. There are also >> modules that are not tied to a particular daemon -- now, would they >> live at the same level as noded?) > > Then block/drbd would be perfectly enough, at least for now. > The reason to put a module behind noded/ or masterd/ is to say "this > should be only used by this daemon". > Of course if we don't have that, why having a 3-layer structure?
I think that a more important point is to keep separated the internals (handled by noded) from the interface exported (to masterd). Bernardo
