Added the list again On 29 April 2013 12:34, Guido Trotter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Bernardo Dal Seno <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 29 April 2013 12:27, Guido Trotter <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Bernardo Dal Seno <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> I think we should decide whether IP means just the protocol or also an >>>> address. Right now the documentation is inconsistent on this regard. >>>> >>> >>> Is it? I believe ip= in the nic field has always been the address. >>> Where does it say it's the protocol? >> >> The problem is not the command line, but the documentation: The man >> page uses "IP address" six times and "IP" four times to mean the same >> thing. >> > > True, but is there any place where it's unclear from the context what > we're referring to? > (Yes, IP is also commonly used to mean "IP address". I think that's ok > as long as there's no confusion) > I double checked the uses, and it doesn't seem so.
No just for consistency. That's why I haven't sent a patch :-) Bernardo
