On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Bernardo Dal Seno <[email protected]>wrote:

> On 16 May 2013 10:54, Thomas Thrainer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Based on the discussion I think this patch series is definitely not the
> > right place for such a change.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > I guess first we should change the way we handle version numbers during
> > development, and then we should also gather realistic requirements for
> > cfgupgrade, which could then lead to a re-write.
>
> Hopefully we won't need to change that much.
>
> > In the meantime, I'll rewrite this patch to only add/remove the
> additional
> > flag in cfgupgrade. IIRC the problem with upgrades in masterd were, that
> > confd has to be able to read the config as well...
>
> But first we need a proper cfgupgrade for 2.9, i.e., one that
> dowgrades to 2.8 instead of 2.7. I have the patch ready and I can send
> it, if you need it, but I was waiting for 2.8 to be packaged so we had
> the proper version numbers in place and avoid confusion. But maybe you
> want to push this series after the cmdlib split anyway. Please let me
> know which you prefer.
>

As you are much deeper into this topic, and my changes are really minor
(see new patch), I'll leave that to you :).
I'd personally prefer to push this series after the cmdlib split, if that
goes through soon-ish.

Thanks,
Thomas


>
> Bernardo
>



-- 
Thomas Thrainer | Software Engineer | [email protected] |

Google Germany GmbH
Dienerstr. 12
80331 München

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens

Reply via email to