On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > after an internal discussion on this, it seems that we are > both talking about the same thing here, but this thread > doesn't reflect it clearly. > > You are right that ifdown should make only node-local > changes and not interact with external systems (e.g.: DNS). > This is the hooks' job to do. > > Dimitris will update the doc to note that, as you suggest, > and also state that one cannot rely on the ifdown script > for crucial actions since a lot of things may happen and > the script may never run. > > I think hooks already contain what we need. If we see in > the future that the environment doesn't suffice, we can > patch the hooks interface accordingly. > > So, shall we send an updated doc incorporating your comments > to proceed? >
Yes, thanks, this sounds perfect. Guido
