LGTM, thanks
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> > --- > test/hs/Test/Ganeti/Locking/Allocation.hs | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/hs/Test/Ganeti/Locking/Allocation.hs > b/test/hs/Test/Ganeti/Locking/Allocation.hs > index 7225e2f..5b80570 100644 > --- a/test/hs/Test/Ganeti/Locking/Allocation.hs > +++ b/test/hs/Test/Ganeti/Locking/Allocation.hs > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ import Ganeti.Locking.Types > > Ganeti.Locking.Allocation is polymorphic in the types of locks > and lock owners. So we can use much simpler types here than Ganeti's > -real locks and lock owners, knowning at polymorphic functions cannot > +real locks and lock owners, knowning that polymorphic functions cannot > exploit the simplicity of the types they're deling with. > > -} > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ instance Lock TestLock where > > {- > > -All states of a LockAllocation every available outside the > +All states of a LockAllocation ever available outside the > Ganeti.Locking.Allocation module must be constructed by starting > with emptyAllocation and applying the exported functions. > > -- > 1.9.1.423.g4596e3a > >
