Dear all: I went ahead and backported most of my changes to trunk which should also go into the 3.0.x branch. Since the branch was created at revision 747, I scanned for changes in trunk after 747 up until earlier today. The following are changes I am not sure whether they should go into branch as well:
Revision 778 - Directory Listing Modified Mon May 7 20:30:47 2007 UTC (9 days, 1 hour ago) by bnicholes Fix a double free issue with when destroying memory pools Revision 777 - Directory Listing Modified Fri May 4 22:27:06 2007 UTC (11 days, 23 hours ago) by bnicholes Add modules/cpu to the build Revision 776 - Directory Listing Modified Fri May 4 22:26:12 2007 UTC (11 days, 23 hours ago) by bnicholes Add a multi cpu module that will dynamically create metric gathering function depending on the number of cpus found in the system Revision 774 - Directory Listing Modified Fri May 4 22:14:47 2007 UTC (11 days, 23 hours ago) by bnicholes Add a memory pool parameter to the module init function Revision 773 - Directory Listing Modified Wed May 2 22:14:28 2007 UTC (13 days, 23 hours ago) by bnicholes rework the interface for the metric modules so that a single module can gather multiple metrics. This also allows the metric names to be different from the module name. Use the -m commandline parameter to discover the names of the metrics that the metric module supports. Revision 765 - Directory Listing Modified Thu Apr 26 05:02:01 2007 UTC (2 weeks, 6 days ago) by massie [Bug 136] gmetric does not allow slope to be set correct fixed by Nick Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Revision 759 - Directory Listing Modified Fri Apr 6 20:08:01 2007 UTC (5 weeks, 5 days ago) by bnicholes Change the name of the module to reflect that it is a plugin module rather than a linkable library. Also put the modules in lib/ganglia directory to avoid name collisions in the lib directory Revision 758 - Directory Listing Modified Fri Apr 6 20:05:28 2007 UTC (5 weeks, 5 days ago) by bnicholes Add an example configuration file that loads and configures the example module Revision 756 - Directory Listing Modified Thu Apr 5 14:52:14 2007 UTC (5 weeks, 6 days ago) by bnicholes add the missing integer value to the user defined metric definition Revision 752 - Directory Listing Modified Mon Apr 2 23:20:38 2007 UTC (6 weeks, 1 day ago) by bnicholes minor cleanups Revision 751 - Directory Listing Modified Mon Apr 2 22:55:23 2007 UTC (6 weeks, 1 day ago) by bnicholes Add a metric description to the output of the -m parameter as well as to the XML output. Revision 750 - Directory Listing Modified Mon Apr 2 22:12:58 2007 UTC (6 weeks, 1 day ago) by bnicholes Modify the -m parameter to also list the loaded modular metrics I am assuming that the Brad's checkins regarding 'modules' should be left in trunk? If the owners of the above check-ins can either backport them to branch or simply let me know that they should go in, I will take care of it. Afterwards, I will check in my fixes for ganglia.spec.in. Thanks for all your help! Cheers, Bernard On 5/16/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As you stated, everything that I have done should remain in trunk only. I > would imagine that almost everything else committed to trunk could be > backported to the 3.0.x branch if desired. > > Brad > > >>> On 5/16/2007 at 4:06 PM, in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do we currently have plans for Ganglia 3.0.5 release? I would > > personally like to see a release very soon -- we have made a few > > enhancements to the webfrontend plus other cleanups to the code. > > Also, given our developer base, we should probably wrap up 3.0.x > > branch and start focusing on 3.1.x (unless we have other plans for > > 3.0.x branch). > > > > However, it looks like since the branch was created, most changes were > > still done to trunk (my changes included). Can we agree on what > > changes should go into 3.0.x branch vs trunk? > > > > I would think that all the dynamically link libraries work which Brad > > has been working on should stay in trunk -- however, if there are > > conflicting changes done to the branch, they should be reverted. > > > > I could try to go through my recent changes and make sure that they go > > into the branch as well -- I hope that other developers can do the > > same. > > > > Makes sense? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Bernard > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Ganglia-developers mailing list > > Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
