On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:44:15PM +0800, Matt Massie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > i'm not sure about that. who checked the patches into the CVS tree? > anyone? if not, where can i find the patches. they slipped right past > me (what are they for?). i looked through the CVS changelog and didn't > see any changes to the darwin code. let's try to get the new stuff in.. > has the code been tested at all?
I know I didn't check anything in, (not even sure the patches have been submitted.) There was a post in late December (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) that said >> Also, I have some patches for machines/darwin.c in the works. >> I've been adding some metric data to it, and fixing some of the >> existing ones. I'll post those as soon as I'm done adding them in. Not a huge deal for me personally, (not enough OS X machines to worry), but it might be nice to have all the metrics for OS X, since there's just stubs and easy ones available now. -- Preston Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Analyst Purdue University Physics Computer Network GPG Fingerprint: 6D27 5DAA F58D C42B 7A6B 8F48 04E4 2465 F353 03F6
