On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 16:11 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > On 2006-08-17 09:55:38 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:46 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > while we are looking into dependencies: > > > APR 1.x is out since quite some time and should solve many bugs. > > > is anyone working on that already? > > > > We're shipping apr 1.2.7 with Fedora Core 6 and RHEL5. FC5 shipped apr > > 1.2.2. Looks like 0.9.x for FC3/FC4/RHEL4. > > > > > another nice thing is that most old systems only ship apr0. so you can > > > easily provide addon packages with apr1 and the removing the intree > > > libraries might not hurt as much there. > > > > It gets a little fun in RH/FC, since we simply ship "apr" (no libversion > > attached), but yeah, the same can still be done w/an apr and a > > compat-apr. > > or just name the new rpms (lib)apr1 and avoid the trouble atall. i mean > they are unofficial/unsupported? rpms only anyway. no?:)
I s'pose you could do that too. :) -- Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
