>>> On 3/12/2008 at 12:17 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:09:22AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>> This leads me back to asking the question, should we remove libconfuse from
> the repository as well?
>
> Either remove libconfuse or put back all libraries and keep using
> --enable-static-build as it was designed.
>
> Since leaving apr also indirectly implies having support for apr 0.9 in the
> code then it should be probably better to remove confuse.
>
>> I believe our reasoning for leaving it in was because
> libconfuse is not a commonly distributed library on many distros. However,
> the only purpose of retaining libconfuse (or APR, expat) in the SVN
> repository, is for static builds.
>
> static builds, don't really need --enable-static-build, and could be done
> without any libraries in srclib and using --with-{apr,expat,confuse} and
> --enable-static (it might require some other fixes as well)
>
OK, I am going to pursue this path and see what happens.
thanks,
Brad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
