>>> On 4/11/2008 at 4:19 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Witham, Timothy D > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, I believe the patch is complete now and will resolve bz#76 for >> 3.0.x. > > Checked into 3.0.x branch r1232. > > I would like to request that we start rolling 3.0.8 betas for an > imminent release -- unless of course there are other bugfixes planned. > > Also, looks like we can have one more release before 3.1.0 (or 3.1.1, > whatever we are calling the release now...), so we'd better start > cracking :-) > > Actually, I wonder if we should call it 3.1.x any more... since we've > had so many 3.0.x releases, it might make 3.1.x not seem like a major > upgrade which it is. Maybe call it 3.5 or 4.0? >
I guess we can always rename the branch later, but it would be good to settle in on a version before we branch. I'm OK with any of the version numbers. Since we have been calling it 3.1.x for a year, I don't think too many people will be confused. At least if they have been monitoring the mailing list. Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
