Thanks for the feedback. Creating these metrics into independent
module makes sense. I'll refactor it to isolate the code within
mod_iostat.c and see how it works out.
Before I do so, is there a "standard" template for configure/make
files to build these DSO modules independently?
Having such deployment template (perhaps also .spec) structure would
encourage other developers to contribute code more easily, I think.

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Brad Nicholes<bnicho...@novell.com> wrote:
>   Thanks for the new module code.  I haven't had a chance to actually look at 
> the code yet but considering that this is a new metric module, it might be 
> better to decouple it from the rest of the Ganglia code as an independent 
> module rather than having the code integrated into metrics.c and the core 
> build system.  If the module is independently buildable then it really 
> doesn't matter if it is linux only or cross platform.  Even if the module 
> remained linux only, only those who are interested would download, build and 
> use it which is fine.  It would also make it much easier for us to simply 
> drop the tarball into the /contrib directory of SVN in order to make it 
> available immediately rather than having to integrate it into the core build 
> and re-release the whole project.  The ideal situation would be to also 
> include a .spec file that would allow the module to be built and packaged 
> into its own RPM.  But just a buildable source tarball would be great.
>
>   It is good to see people contributing new modules to the project even if 
> they are only for a single platform.  The more modules we have to offer, the 
> better the whole project is for everybody.
>
> Brad
>
>>>> On 6/30/2009 at 9:00 PM, in message
> <8121824c0906302000y181b23adr87ebd98124450...@mail.gmail.com>, JB Kim
> <jbremn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> Wow, it didn't occur to me this thread was more than a year ago. Time
>> surely flies when you have a newborn at home. :-)
>> In any case, I've made necessary modifications to 3.1.2 release to
>> allow iostat-related metrics for linux.
>>
>> Here is the tarball that compiles on linux and reports 7 extra metrics
>> from a new DSO module called iostat.
>>
>> http://www.remnantone.com/pkgs/ganglia/ganglia-3.1.2_io.tar.gz
>>
>> The mod_iostat contains the following metrics:
>>
>>   - io_readtot
>>   - io_readkbtot
>>   - io_writetot
>>   - io_writekbtot
>>   - io_svctmax
>>   - io_queuemax
>>   - io_busymax
>>
>> The code changes have been made to:
>>
>>   - libmetrics/libmetrics.h
>>   - libmetrics/linux/metrics.c
>>   - gmond/modules/mod_iostat.c
>>   - Makefile.am changes to include a new module build
>>
>> There are couple of points:
>>
>> * The new set of metrics are only for linux at this point. (supports
>> 2.4 and 2.6 kernels)
>>   As you can see, all of the metric functions are implemented within
>> libmetrics/linux/metrics.c
>> * These metric functions report aggregated values. 4 of them are sums
>> across disks, 3 of them are max across the disks.
>>   These metrics would be ideal for cluster computing nodes which often
>> has 1 or 2 disks, not for large servers with multitude of disks.
>> * I had thought about making things isolated to modules/iostat/mod_iostat.c.
>>   However, since the current implementation only works on linux, I
>> decided it was best to place it in libmetrics/linux, which is
>>   already os-dependent code, rather than trying to support multi-os
>> build with bunch of #ifdef/#endif inside of
>> modules/iostat/mod_iostat.c.
>> * Future improvements should consider reporting independent io metrics
>> for user supplied list of disks instead of aggregating the whole.
>> * Lastly, apologies for ugly code...
>>
>> If there's sufficient interest and you would like these metrics to be
>> included in the subsequent release, I'll enhance/modify the code as
>> necessary.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:58 PM, JB Kim<jbremn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sure, sounds like a plan. I'll take a crack at it and let you know.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Brad Nicholes <bnicho...@novell.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> On 4/28/2008 at 8:26 PM, in message
>>>> <8121824c0804281926wb285fe4u5f269cfbf58a0...@mail.gmail.com>, "JB Kim"
>>>>
>>>> <jbremn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Folks,
>>>> >
>>>> > I've made some changes to ganglia 3.0.7 gmond code to provide aggregated
>>>> > disk IO
>>>> > statistics for linux hosts. Since a given host can have one or more 
>>>> > disks,
>>>> > the
>>>> > values from each individual disk are aggregated to a sum or to a max.
>>>> >
>>>> > It seems like a lot of folks are using a wrapper for iostat command to 
>>>> > send
>>>> > data
>>>> > via gmetric. While this is also a useful approach, I thought it would be
>>>> > nice
>>>> > and convenient to have this reported from gmond, although the data
>>>> > would be summarized
>>>> > for an entire host. The code simply reads from either /proc/partitions
>>>> > or /proc/diskstats, and
>>>> > maintains the old and the new values for each disk to calculate the diff.
>>>> >
>>>> > These are the new metrics that were added:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >   Ganglia_metric_cb_define("io_readtot",          io_readtot_func);
>>>> >   Ganglia_metric_cb_define("io_readkbtot",        io_readkbtot_func);
>>>> >   Ganglia_metric_cb_define("io_writetot",         io_writetot_func);
>>>> >   Ganglia_metric_cb_define("io_writekbtot",       io_writekbtot_func);
>>>> >   Ganglia_metric_cb_define("io_svctmax",          io_svctmax_func);
>>>> >   Ganglia_metric_cb_define("io_queuemax",         io_queuemax_func);
>>>> >   Ganglia_metric_cb_define("io_busymax",          io_busymax_func);
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > If you are interested, you can download and try out the source here:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.remnantone.com/pkgs/ganglia/ganglia-3.0.7_io.tar.gz
>>>> >
>>>> > and the README doc about the modifications I've made:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.remnantone.com/pkgs/ganglia/README
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I have been running this modified gmond for sometime at work and it
>>>> > worked out quite
>>>> > nicely.
>>>> >
>>>> > I don't know how relevant this is considering the pending move to more
>>>> > modular
>>>> > framework for gmond core metrics in 3.1.x, but hopefully it will be
>>>> > useful for folks still dependent on version 3.0.x. Having said that,
>>>> > I'd be happy to help
>>>> > integrate these metrics into 3.1.x framework as .so loadable modules,
>>>> > if there's sufficient
>>>> > interest.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest that you convert these metrics to modules first so that 
>>>> they
>> can be included as part of the 3.1.x branch.  Then if there is enough
>> interest in backporting them, they can be backported to the 3.0.x branch.
>>>>
>>>> Brad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to