Is it preferred to raise backport proposals for 3.1 all in a single
email, or start a separate thread for each?
I've just fixed bug 237, this is an essential backport I believe, as it
fixes a seg fault/coding error. (trunk r2006)
My fix for bug 232 is also backwards compatible and safe to backport
now, thanks to a configuration option that allows people to decide when
they want to adopt the new behavior. I believe that backporting this to
3.1 provides people with the opportunity to migrate to lowercase
hostname directories independently of when they migrate to 3.2 or
trunk. (trunk r2004 and r2005 contain this fix)
Regards,
Daniel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
