Hi Brad:

Thanks for the confirmation.

However, I have another issue related to the first problem.  Basically
my x86_64 CentOS is detected as "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" and thus it
is setting LIB_SUFFIX to "lib" instead of "lib64".

Do RHEL hosts really identify themselves as x86_64-redhat-linux*?  How
about Fedora?  I do confirm that this works as expected on an openSUSE
box.

Perhaps we should reverse the logic and make a special case for Debian instead?

Cheers,

Bernard

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Brad Nicholes <bnicho...@novell.com> wrote:
> I am seeing the same thing.  To get past it I just hardcoded the path to the 
> sed utility.  I'm guessing that either some platforms or some version of 
> libtool isn't setting the SED environment variable but the configure script 
> assumes that it is.
>
> Brad
>
>>>> On 3/2/2010 at 6:21 PM, in message
> <d4c731da1003021721s695b2d27j235ecee31cdca...@mail.gmail.com>, Bernard Li
> <bern...@vanhpc.org> wrote:
>> Hi all:
>>
>> I am having problems building trunk r2290.
>>
>> Specifically I have 2 issues:
>>
>> 1) During ./configure
>>
>> ./configure: line 20056: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
>> ./configure: line 20056: `x86_64-suse-linux*)'
>>
>> 2) During make -C web conf.php
>>
>> make: Entering directory `/root/code/ganglia.trunk/web'
>> ../scripts/fixconfig conf.php.in
>> ../scripts/fixconfig: line 60: @SED@: command not found
>> ../scripts/fixconfig: line 67: : No such file or directory
>> make: *** [conf.php] Error 1
>> make: Leaving directory `/root/code/ganglia.trunk/web'
>>
>> The first issue could be fixed by the following patch:
>>
>> Index: configure.in
>> ===================================================================
>> --- configure.in      (revision 2290)
>> +++ configure.in      (working copy)
>> @@ -341,8 +341,7 @@
>>  # (insert others here)
>>  LIB_SUFFIX=lib
>>  case $host in
>> -x86_64-redhat-linux*)
>> -x86_64-suse-linux*)
>> +x86_64-redhat-linux* | x86_64-suse-linux*)
>>    LIB_SUFFIX=lib64
>>    ;;
>>  esac
>>
>> The second issue...  does it have something to do with the old
>> autotools that I'm using?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bernard
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ganglia-developers mailing list
>> Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Ganglia-developers mailing list
> Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to