>>> On 9/9/2010 at 09:19 AM, in message <716533.84440...@web113303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, Martin Knoblauch <kn...@knobisoft.de> wrote: > Hi, > > my € 0.02 are: > > +1 for Trunk > -1 for 3.1.x and 3.0.x. > > why am I opposed to the backports? Dwoo introduces considerable new > infrastructure that *I* view not suitable for the "stable" and "legacy" > trees. > Both of them are bug-fix only in my opinion. It is fine for trunk, no > question. > > Does the GPL licensing cause any real issues to end users? Just curious. > The > situation is pretty old by now anyway. >
The GPL could cause problems for the end user of they decide to modify or customize the frontend and then redistribute it. In this case they would be required to release the source code. That may not be an issue since all of the code is PHP script code anyway. But the bigger issues is that there is a license conflict which can bring heartache to some customers. The fact that we have an option in trunk whether we backport to the 3.1 or 3.0 branches, gives end users an option if they feel nervous about powertemplate. At the very least, we should probably backport the Dwoo code to 3.1 and 3.0 and make if available even if we don't put the backport in the main repository branch. Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
